How to choose a monitor to play?
Playing for fun is casual. Thanks to the great popularity and proliferation of electronic sports, many players are looking to acquire the greatest advantage when it comes to playing the hardware they purchase. The performance of our PC is important, obviously, but also they are, even more, the peripherals that we use when playing: Mouse, mat, keyboard, earphones… monitor.
It is difficult among so many brands, advertising and nomenclature to be able to choose correctly, especially for the novice user. But this guide will let you know how to distinguish good monitors so that winning or losing just depends on you.
Monitor resolution and size
The size is to taste of the consumer, although large is almost always better. If you have space a monitor of 27 “or more is a joy and will allow you to play with GamePad on it at a distance higher than the one you play with keyboard and mouse. In addition these monitors have a resolution of 2560×1440 that, although it does not offer any advantage and need greater graphical power, will make the video games look more defined.
If you lack so much space, a 23″or 24 ” 1080p monitor is the best choice. They are not very small, they are very economical and your eyes will cover the whole panel with ease.
If you have big space and money is not an inconvenience a UHD monitor is a fantastic choice, although your team must be prepared for it and it is easy to have to disburse the same amount that has cost you on monitor on two graphics cards last batch. In addition, no console is capable of moving a video game to 4k.
We’re already in the field. There is no perfect panel at the moment; each one has its advantages and drawbacks. TN panel monitors are very economical, and are the most popular among the gamer for their rapid response and refresh rate (Hz) (read about120hz monitors here), but are susceptible to drastic color changes when viewed at different angles (depends on the quality of the panel).
The VA panels have a good contrast ratio, a decent color reproduction and the purest blacks, but they have ghosting problems that can ruin the experience of the most demanding gamer.
The most widespread nowadays are the IPS because they have an excellent color reproduction, good grayscale and a great viewing angle. The problem is that they cannot match the fast response of TN panels (although they improve each year).
This is the most important thing if we are going to play relatively competitive to an FPS or we want the best performance in fighting games etc.
Gaming monitors must have a quick response and a high rate of soda. The most common thing is for manufacturers to publish gray-to-gray response time, that is, the time it takes for a pixel to transition between one gray shadows to another. A low response time will make the transition between images more fluid, crisp, and not suffer the famous ghosting problems. Ideally, the time “Gaming monitors must have a quick response and a high rate of refreshment” of response is 1-2 MS, but 4-8 MS is more than decent and only the most demanding will perceive some difference.
The refresh rate of a monitor, expressed in Hertz, refers to the number of images displayed per second. Most LCD have a 60hz refresh, something more than enough to watch movies (24fps) and work with it. But in the FPS video games The difference that we find in front of the monitors of 120hz and 144hz is from day to night. It decreases the motion blur and the screen tearing, helping you see everything in a more crisp and smooth. Are the favorites for Counter Strike players, keep in mind that you need a PC that of those frames per second and no console gives.
There is V-Sync to eliminate tearing, but in almost all games it intercedes on the sensitivity and movement of the cursor. No gamer has it activated when it comes to playing esports like Counter Strike.
The input lag is something super important. What else. It’s the time between sending the digital video output from our graphics card until we see the picture on the monitor. In FPS games can mean the difference between killing or getting killed, even if it is milliseconds the difference I can assure you is more than perceptible. An input lag below 10 MS is acceptable to be an excellent monitor gaming, there are even less than 4ms. You can search in databases carried by independent media to see your monitor or your TV.
Image quality or performance?
If you only play FPS games as the Counter-Strike I think it is worth a panel monitor TN with 144hz and very little input lag. If you are a casual gamer or you play in console I think it is best to find an IPS panel that has the least possible input lag. The same applies to TVs, check the input lag always of extreme importance in fighting games.
“You’ll have to choose between the best picture quality, or the highest performance ” performance/price ratio the best is a TN panel, but the contrast, viewing angles and color reproduction is far from the IPS monitors. There’s still No perfect monitor, so you’ll have to choose.
Also be aware of the connections. If you are going to connect the console the ideal is to have HDMI input next to the mandatory today Display Port and DVI to connect to the PC.